| To: | toml@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPSec: Policy dst bundles exhausting storage |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:32:50 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <OF5BE4EDD9.7B1D7854-ON86256D41.007F1E5C-86256D41.008145BF@pok.ibm.com> |
| References: | <OF5BE4EDD9.7B1D7854-ON86256D41.007F1E5C-86256D41.008145BF@pok.ibm.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: "Tom Lendacky" <toml@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:32:00 -0500 One other thing I did notice in both the v4 and v6 bundle create functions is the line x->u.rt.fl = *fl. Shouldn't this be a memcpy? Gcc emits a memcpy() check the assembly. Structure assignment is a perfectly legal to do this. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | IPSec: Policy dst bundles exhausting storage, Tom Lendacky |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | IPSec: Policy dst bundles exhausting storage, Tom Lendacky |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPSec: Policy dst bundles exhausting storage, Tom Lendacky |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |