| To: | chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 3c59x |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:43:05 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, bogdan.costescu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200306101741.h5AHf8sG008844@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> |
| References: | <20030610.103111.26297722.davem@redhat.com> <200306101741.h5AHf8sG008844@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: chas williams <chas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:39:15 -0400 i was thinking you could do it higher up, like around the hard_start_xmit level. this would create a bit of replicated code, but you could abuse the preprocessor a bit i imagine. 3c59x already does this, so now we'd have 4 different copies. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 3c59x, chas williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Ralph Doncaster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 3c59x, chas williams |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Route cache performance under stress, Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |