netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: 3c59x

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: 3c59x
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ak@xxxxxxx, bogdan.costescu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030610162342.GB1959@gtf.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306101801070.26879-100000@kenzo.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de> <20030610162029.GA8168@wotan.suse.de> <20030610162342.GB1959@gtf.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:23:42 -0400
   
   I prefer a compile-time test.

This means end users don't see the benefit, so I definitely
prefer Andi's idea.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [patch]: CONFIG_IPV6_SUBTREES fix for MIPv6, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: 3c59x, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: 3c59x (was Route cache performance under stress), Jeff Garzik
Next by Thread:  Re: 3c59x, Jeff Garzik
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]