| To: | ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, ralph@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 09:38:11 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xerox@xxxxxxxxxx, sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306100828220.26498@ns.istop.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306092200150.28167@ns.istop.com> <20030610061010.Y36963@shell.cyberus.ca> <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306100828220.26498@ns.istop.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 09:10:43 -0400 (EDT) No, as I said I'm moving ~30mbps and ~10kpps in and out of 2 3c905cx cards. This is because the driver still uses PIO, I am rather sure of this. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Route cache performance under stress, Ralph Doncaster |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |