| To: | sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 09:10:44 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | ralph+d@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030610043453.GC23009@netnation.com> |
| References: | <20030609204257.L35799@shell.cyberus.ca> <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306092200150.28167@ns.istop.com> <20030610043453.GC23009@netnation.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 21:34:53 -0700 Broken parts of the code only get fixed if enough people whine This isn't how I operate... or especially if somebody decides to actually fix it. This is. I hack on something because I want to and it seems interesting to me at the moment. Not because someone is shitting their pants in public about it. :) So, for future reference, you'll get more using honey than vinegar from me :) Franks a lot, David S. Miller davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 3c59x (was Route cache performance under stress), Bogdan Costescu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Ralph Doncaster |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Route cache performance under stress, Jamal Hadi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |