| To: | xerox@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 08 Jun 2003 23:28:27 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <001801c32e50$57ef0750$4a00000a@badass> |
| References: | <20030608.225837.115923841.davem@redhat.com> <001801c32e50$57ef0750$4a00000a@badass> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: "CIT/Paul" <xerox@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 02:28:30 -0400 OK so let's try this.. If you can show me a linux router can can route 100mbps or more of juno-z.101f.c attack without dropping packets I will be thoroughly impressed :) I am willing to test out any code/patches and settings that you can think of and post some results.. Ok, Robert are you willing to help too? :-) |
| Previous by Date: | RE: Route cache performance under stress, CIT/Paul |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Simon Kirby |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Route cache performance under stress, CIT/Paul |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |