| To: | rddunlap@xxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netlink tester program |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 02 Jun 2003 20:35:05 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <33001.4.64.196.31.1054611142.squirrel@www.osdl.org> |
| References: | <20030602140452.039248de.rddunlap@osdl.org> <20030602.145619.71112623.davem@redhat.com> <33001.4.64.196.31.1054611142.squirrel@www.osdl.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 20:32:22 -0700 (PDT) The code is absolute, no doubt about it. It is the authority. That doesn't make it right in all cases AFAIK. I totally agree. Now, given that I think that the netlink interface is poorly documented, and that I'm trying to add some kernel code that uses it, and that I'm trying to test said kernel code with a userspace test program, I also plan to add such documentation that I think is warranted to make it easy to use, even by non-kernel devevlopers. This is exactly how things should work. Where there is a need for X _AND_ someone willing to create X, it will be created. No arguments from me on this :-) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: netlink tester program, David Brownell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: netlink tester program, John S. Denker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: netlink tester program, Randy.Dunlap |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Prefix List patch against 2.5.70, Krishna Kumar |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |