Re: [PATCH] - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types.

netdev

Re: [PATCH] - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types.

To:	krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types.
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 25 May 2003 19:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<3ECE64F2.5000300@us.ibm.com>
References:	<3ECE64F2.5000300@us.ibm.com>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

   From: Krishna Kumar <krkumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:14:10 -0700

   I am using 2.5.68 and found XFRM_MSG_BASE being defined, but
   RTM_BASE used for all XFRM messages, changed it. Current mailer
   (hopefully) shouldn't screw up the tabs.

Applied, thank you.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types., Krishna Kumar Re: [PATCH] - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types., David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Re: Route cache performance under stress, Florian Weimer
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types., Krishna Kumar
Next by Thread:	Resend: current bandwidth measurement, N N Ashok
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]