| To: | acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.5.69] wanrouter clean up MOD_*_USE_COUNT |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 22 May 2003 00:59:31 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | daniel@xxxxxxxx, ncorbic@xxxxxxxxxxx, dm@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030522004718.GB13028@conectiva.com.br> |
| References: | <20030521231801.GE10295@conectiva.com.br> <20030521.162707.88487215.davem@redhat.com> <20030522004718.GB13028@conectiva.com.br> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 21:47:18 -0300 Em Wed, May 21, 2003 at 04:27:07PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: > Note that, as I said in another email, these MOD_* calls can't just be > deleted, the PROCFS registry etc. have to set ->owner fields correctly > before this is valid. Yoshfuji-san has already done this in wanproc.c. That's true. But we need to check for other cases to make sure they are ok. For example, wanrouter_router_devlist. If you really think it's fine, just resend the change and I'll install it. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] wanrouter/wanmain: fix namespace, fixing the current problem with device_shutdown, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: comment about struct tcp_tw_bucket in struct sock, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.5.69] wanrouter clean up MOD_*_USE_COUNT, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.5.69] wanrouter clean up MOD_*_USE_COUNT, Daniel McNeil |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |