netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: is sk->reuse truly a boolean?

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: is sk->reuse truly a boolean?
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 00:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030521.020242.16237776.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
References: <20030521.015317.125867074.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20030520165831.GG801@conectiva.com.br> <20030521.020242.16237776.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 02:02:42 +0900 (JST)

   In article <20030520165831.GG801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 20 May 2003 
13:58:31 -0300), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
   
   > So just delete the test?
   
   Hmm, (bacause I want to remember this path in the code,) how about #if 0 ?
   David?

You may #if 0 this as long as you:

1) Add comment.
2) Add identical code block to tcp_ipv6.c
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] switch arcnet over to initcalls, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:  Re: is sk->reuse truly a boolean?, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Re: is sk->reuse truly a boolean?, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Next by Thread:  Re: is sk->reuse truly a boolean?, David S. Miller
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]