Re: is sk->reuse truly a boolean?

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <20030520165831.GG801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 20 May 2003 
13:58:31 -0300), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> > I don't think so.  Above modification will break current 
> > reasonable bind(2) behavior.
> > 
> > Well, it would be dead code, which would be used for (still 
> > unsupported) SO_REUSEPORT.
> 
> So just delete the test?

Hmm, (bacause I want to remember this path in the code,) how about #if 0 ?
David?

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA