| To: | ak@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] switch sdla to initcalls |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 May 2003 01:34:53 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | hch@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030521082630.GF22869@wotan.suse.de> |
| References: | <20030521081938.GD22869@wotan.suse.de> <20030521102512.A30373@lst.de> <20030521082630.GF22869@wotan.suse.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 10:26:30 +0200 ISA probe order has nothing to do with namespaces or single cards. It works by reading values from specific registers and completely different devices can conflict. Correct. However, this sdla thing seems to want to be probed after ethif_probe() runs. And moving this to initcalls preserves that relative relationship. I have to admit that I must feign ignorance here. And that someone who really understands the EISA/ISA probe ordering requirements should document them as best as possible in Space.c |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] switch sdla to initcalls, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender, Russell King |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] switch sdla to initcalls, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] switch sdla to initcalls, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |