| To: | "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@" <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: is sk->reuse truly a boolean? |
| From: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 May 2003 14:08:36 -0300 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030521.020242.16237776.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> |
| Organization: | Conectiva S.A. |
| References: | <20030520162906.GF801@conectiva.com.br> <20030521.015317.125867074.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20030520165831.GG801@conectiva.com.br> <20030521.020242.16237776.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.4i |
Em Wed, May 21, 2003 at 02:02:42AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ escreveu: > In article <20030520165831.GG801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 20 May 2003 > 13:58:31 -0300), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > > > > I don't think so. Above modification will break current > > > reasonable bind(2) behavior. > > > > > > Well, it would be dead code, which would be used for (still > > > unsupported) SO_REUSEPORT. > > > > So just delete the test? > > Hmm, (bacause I want to remember this path in the code,) how about #if 0 ? > David? Sounds good to me. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: is sk->reuse truly a boolean?, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 2.5.69++] fixup for latest netdev change., Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: is sk->reuse truly a boolean?, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: is sk->reuse truly a boolean?, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |