netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Route hash code comparison

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Route hash code comparison
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <16074.21513.492796.943255@robur.slu.se>
References: <16074.21513.492796.943255@robur.slu.se>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 18:12:57 +0200
   
   The new hash have random keys but seems to be pretty consistent in
   term of hashing at least from observerations. No DoS experiments
   done.

Thank you for posting these test results Robert.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Patch for NETLINK_TCPDIAG, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] Sysfs net device device link, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:  Route hash code comparison, Robert Olsson
Next by Thread:  [PATCH 2.5.69++] fixup for latest netdev change., Stephen Hemminger
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]