| To: | sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Route cache performance under stress |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 20 May 2003 17:13:58 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030521000936.GA19077@netnation.com> |
| References: | <20030520011053.GB10419@netnation.com> <20030519.181405.35017608.davem@redhat.com> <20030521000936.GA19077@netnation.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Simon Kirby <sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 17:09:36 -0700 It's rather difficult to follow, but I don't see any "h4r h4r, expl0it th3 L1nux h4sh" comments or anything in the code that seems to attempt to exploit the hash algorithms in (older) Linux. Look at the vc[] table and how it uses this in rndip(). |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Simon Kirby |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Simon Kirby |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Route cache performance under stress, Florian Weimer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |