| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: acenic lockup |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 May 2003 13:11:35 -0400 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, anton@xxxxxxxxx, jes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030508.090049.48375778.davem@redhat.com>; from davem@redhat.com on Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:00:49AM -0700 |
| References: | <20030507.123421.133894691.davem@redhat.com> <200305072221.CAA00973@mops.inr.ac.ru> <20030508.090049.48375778.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:00:49AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Note to Jeff, independant of what is being discussed here, a real
> audit of drivers that blindly invoke netif_wake_queue() from transmit
> timeout watchdog routine is in order at some point. This is what
> Alexey is referring to as "same bogus netif_wake_queue()".
Agreed. Alexey has pointed out netif_wake_queue stupidities in
drivers before, and he's absolutely right.
Jeff
P.S. Can you please email @pobox.com for stuff that is not Red Hat
specific? I am trying to use @redhat.com for only official Red Hat
business. My boss forces me to bk-commit as @redhat.com, otherwise you
would never see that address in public at all.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: acenic lockup, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: acenic lockup, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: acenic lockup, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: acenic lockup, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |