Re: [PATCH] af_pppox: create module infrastructure for protocol modules

To:	maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] af_pppox: create module infrastructure for protocol modules
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 01 May 2003 02:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<1051726260.13512.59.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References:	<5.1.0.14.2.20030429123317.10d71178@unixmail.qualcomm.com> <20030429.192931.104061911.davem@redhat.com> <1051726260.13512.59.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

   From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: 30 Apr 2003 11:11:37 -0700

   And like I said before if protocol wants for some reason to be
   around until sk is destroyed it will simply do sk_set_owner() right
   after alloc_sk().

Ok Maxim, thanks for your comments and insight.

I believe this whole discussion is going to take a different
course towards a solution, different than anything discussed
in this thread so far.

Please follow the discussion with topic "dev->destructor" on this list
(netdev) to see precisely what I am talking about.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [PATCH] af_pppox: create module infrastructure for protocol modules, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Favorite network stress tests?, Robert Olsson
Next by Date:	Re: purpose of the skb head pool, Florian Weimer
Previous by Thread:	Re: Favorite network stress tests?, Robert Olsson
Next by Thread:	Re: purpose of the skb head pool, Florian Weimer
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]