netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

IPsecv6 integrity failures not dropped

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: IPsecv6 integrity failures not dropped
From: latten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:17:04 -0500
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
I am running IPSecv6 on 2.5.67 with patch-2.5.67-bk8.

If AH authentication or ESP encryption integrity check for an 
incoming packet fails, result is an ICMPv6 Parameter problem 
of Unknown-Next-Header, instead of just dropping packet. This 
is because xfrm6_rcv() expects an unsigned-8-bit return value 
from the input handler, i.e. ah6_input() or esp6_input(). But handler 
returns a signed int (-EINVAL) that seems to be getting converted into 
a "u8" via 2's complement, because ah6_input() says it is returning
-EINVAL/-22, but xfrm6_rcv() says it got a return value of 234,
which it believes to be valid and passes to ip6_input() who thinks it is 
the next header.  

I modified ah6_input() and esp6_input() to return zero instead of -EINVAL
in the fix below. I tested it and it works.

Please let me know if this is ok. 

Joy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

--- ah6.c.orig  2003-04-17 16:04:07.000000000 -0500
+++ ah6.c       2003-04-18 14:15:37.000000000 -0500
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
 free_out:
        kfree(tmp_hdr);
 out:
-       return -EINVAL;
+       return 0;
 }
 
 void ah6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt, 
--- esp6.c.orig 2003-04-17 17:07:25.000000000 -0500
+++ esp6.c      2003-04-17 17:08:17.000000000 -0500
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@
        return ret_nexthdr;
 
 out:
-       return -EINVAL;
+       return 0;
 }
 
 static u32 esp6_get_max_size(struct xfrm_state *x, int mtu)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>