| To: | blueflux@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH][RESEND] Update of tcp_syncookies explanation |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 01 Apr 2003 09:47:25 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304011911270.22637-200000@laptop1.agatha> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304011911270.22637-200000@laptop1.agatha> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Oskar Andreasson <blueflux@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 19:33:13 +0200 (CEST) If anyone has any objections against this patch, please tell me so, with an explanation of why! You didn't explain how TCP syncookies "seriously violates the TCP protocol" yet you choose to remove that statement written by Alexey. Either retain Alexey's statement (because it's true) or replace it with proper text. I'm not going into the details of how syncookies violates the TCP protocol here, that has been hashed out many times on netdev and linux-net years in the past, so I direct people to search up such discussions instead of starting up yet another flame war here about the topic. Thanks. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes], Feldman, Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Is a driver allowed to modify dev->flags?, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH][RESEND] Update of tcp_syncookies explanation, Oskar Andreasson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][RESEND] Update of tcp_syncookies explanation, Oskar Andreasson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |