| To: | torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: BUG or not? GFP_KERNEL with interrupts disabled. |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:29:54 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | dane@xxxxxxxxxx, shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx, bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bonding-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030327.125507.104718048.davem@redhat.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303271120230.31459-100000@home.transmeta.com> <20030327.113933.123322481.davem@redhat.com> <20030327.125507.104718048.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:55:07 -0800 (PST)
Alexey has pointed out a bug in my changes.
@@ -1088,6 +1086,9 @@ void smp_percpu_timer_interrupt(struct p
: /* no outputs */
: "r" (pstate));
} while (time_after_eq(tick, compare));
+
+ local_irq_enable();
+ irq_exit();
}
static void __init smp_setup_percpu_timer(void)
Of course this is bogus.
The IRQ enable needs to occur in the irq_exit() branch right
before do_softirq() is invoked.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: BUG or not? GFP_KERNEL with interrupts disabled., David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ?completeness of IPsec feature-set, John S. Denker |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: BUG or not? GFP_KERNEL with interrupts disabled., David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | [Bonding][patch] Adding Transmit load balancing mode to bonding, shmulik . hen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |