| To: | shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Bonding][patch] Adding Transmit load balancing mode to bonding |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:06:27 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bonding-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303271705580.7106-100000@jrslxjul4.npdj.intel.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303271705580.7106-100000@jrslxjul4.npdj.intel.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: shmulik.hen@xxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:38:02 +0200 (IST) Balancing is connection oriented (e.g. by IPv4 destination address) so packet order is always kept. You could also key off of the destination/source port as well for UDP/TCP/SCTP. Have you experimented with this? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Bonding][patch] Adding Transmit load balancing mode to bonding, shmulik . hen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes], Robert Olsson |
| Previous by Thread: | [Bonding][patch] Adding Transmit load balancing mode to bonding, shmulik . hen |
| Next by Thread: | 300 Modelos de Cartas comerciais, avisos, convites, propostas, etc., Redação Comercial |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |