| To: | Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module. |
| From: | Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:10:15 +0200 |
| Cc: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Robin Holt <holt@xxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1046996987.17718.144.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303061500310.31368-100000@mandrake.americas.sgi.com> <20030306231905.M838@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1046996987.17718.144.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> |
| Reply-to: | vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 7 March 2003 02:29, Alan Cox wrote: > On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 23:19, Russell King wrote: > > "klibc doesnt really matter" > > > > I'd prefer not to have to have thousands of special programs around > > just to be able to boot my machines, especially when it was all in- > > kernel up until this point. > > > > klibc yes, dietlibc with random other garbage in some random > > filesystem which'd need maintaining - no thanks. > > You can build the dhcp client with glibc static into your initrd. Anything built static against glibs tends to be 400K+. -- vda |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module., Michael Mueller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module., Russell King |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Make ipconfig.c work as a loadable module., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Next by Thread: | unix socket latency regression from 2.4 to 2.5 (and multicast AF_UNIX benchmarks), Chris Friesen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |