| To: | jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Re: IPSec: setkey -DP freezes machine |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 03 Mar 2003 04:19:50 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | toml@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303032238240.10142-100000@blackbird.intercode.com.au> |
| References: | <20030303.013451.20307573.davem@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303032238240.10142-100000@blackbird.intercode.com.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:13:55 +1100 (EST) On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, David S. Miller wrote: > Alternatively, a family parameter could be added to the compile_policy() > operation, but this duplicates data already present in our native > xfrm_userpolicy_info format. > > I like this solution, it seems the cleanest. Ok, here's a patch which does this. Looks good, I'll apply this. If more problems are found, we can patch on top of this. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] Re: IPSec: setkey -DP freezes machine, James Morris |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: anyone ever done multicast AF_UNIX sockets?, Terje Eggestad |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] Re: IPSec: setkey -DP freezes machine, James Morris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Re: IPSec: setkey -DP freezes machine, Tom Lendacky |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |