| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 IPSEC support |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 22 Feb 2003 21:49:35 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kunihiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030222.031326.103246837.davem@redhat.com> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20030222202623.38d41d8a.kazunori@miyazawa.org> <20030222.031326.103246837.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello. In article <20030222.031326.103246837.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Sat, 22 Feb 2003 03:13:26 -0800 (PST)), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > Nothing in xfrm routines really need to reference ipv6 module > functions, please eliminate this dependency. Breaking ipv6 as module > is ok for temporary development, but eventually it must be solved. xfrm_policy.c:xfrm6_bundle_create() seems to depend on ip6_route_output() as xfrm_bundle_create() depends on __ip_route_output_key(). How do we solve this dependency? inter-module? -- Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 IPSEC support, Kazunori Miyazawa |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 IPSEC support, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 IPSEC support, Kazunori Miyazawa |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 IPSEC support, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |