| To: | kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 IPSEC support |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 22 Feb 2003 03:13:26 -0800 (PST) |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kunihiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030222202623.38d41d8a.kazunori@miyazawa.org> |
| References: | <20030222202623.38d41d8a.kazunori@miyazawa.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Kazunori Miyazawa <kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 20:26:23 +0900 I also moved the functions for ah, and esp. I don't think this is so good idea... As a result of moving IPv6 IPsec functions to net/ipv4, it currently prevents to make IPv6 as a module. This is one of the reasons why ah/esp ipv6 should stay under ipv6. Nothing in xfrm routines really need to reference ipv6 module functions, please eliminate this dependency. Breaking ipv6 as module is ok for temporary development, but eventually it must be solved. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] IPv6 IPSEC support, Kazunori Miyazawa |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 IPSEC support, Kazunori Miyazawa |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] IPv6 IPSEC support, Kazunori Miyazawa |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6 IPSEC support, Kazunori Miyazawa |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |