netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size)

To: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: cs89x0 in 2.5 (was Re: eepro100 - 802.1q - mtu size)
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:49:28 -0500
Cc: alan@xxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20030117172719.GA31343@codemonkey.org.uk>
References: <20030117145357.GA1139@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20030117160840.GR12676@stingr.net> <20030117162818.GA1074@gtf.org> <20030117172719.GA31343@codemonkey.org.uk>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 05:27:19PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:28:18AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
>  > The reason why the patch was not accepted is that it changes one magic
>  > number to another magic number, and without chipset docs, I had no idea
>  > what either magic number really meant.
> 
> Whilst on the subject of magic numbers in net drivers, did we ever get
> to the bottom of 2.4's ChangeSet 1.587.9.20 
> 
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davej/patches/2.5/2.5.48/split-dj1/net-cs89x0-media-corrections.diff


IIRC it came from -ac tree without explanation, and I think akpm said it
broke stuff.  Since it has an alive maintainer (akpm), I would rather
let Alan and Andrew fight it out :)  Whatever they decide is fine with
me for 2.5.

        Jeff




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>