| To: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs |
| From: | Wichert Akkerman <wichert@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 8 Jan 2003 18:01:39 +0100 |
| Cc: | Maciej Soltysiak <solt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301081718340.4542-100000@dns.toxicfilms.tv> |
| Mail-followup-to: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Maciej Soltysiak <solt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <20030108150201.GA30490@wiggy.net> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301081718340.4542-100000@dns.toxicfilms.tv> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
Previously Maciej Soltysiak wrote: > I seem to be getting better results than you, i think that it is not an > issue of ipv6 implementation but simply the case of time sensitive > traffic fighting with other Internet traffic over tunnels through ipv4 > networks. Actually, I don't follow this. How could any kind of traffic shaping result in my client not sending ACKs, which is what the tcpdump seems to indicate? I can understand packets being dropped which would result in retransmits, but that is not the case here. Wichert. (usual I'm-no-network-guru-and-might-be-misreading-things disclaimer here) -- Wichert Akkerman <wichert@xxxxxxxxx> http://www.wiggy.net/ A random hacker |
| Previous by Date: | Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs, Wichert Akkerman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs, Maciej Soltysiak |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs, Wichert Akkerman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ipv6 stack seems to forget to send ACKs, Maciej Soltysiak |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |