| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: snd_cwnd drawn and quartered |
| From: | Werner Almesberger <wa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Jan 2003 05:31:02 -0300 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, chengjin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030102030858.E1363@almesberger.net>; from wa@almesberger.net on Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 03:08:58AM -0300 |
| References: | <20021224225040.A22201@almesberger.net> <200301020138.EAA32608@sex.inr.ac.ru> <20030102030858.E1363@almesberger.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
I wrote: > Okay, this it does. I guess the only case where this would make a > difference is if your network duplicates packets. ... and, of course, when losing retransmitted segments, oops. - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: snd_cwnd drawn and quartered, Werner Almesberger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | One-way Gigabit Ethernet TCP performance with Jumbo frames, Steffen Persvold |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: snd_cwnd drawn and quartered, Werner Almesberger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: snd_cwnd drawn and quartered, Werner Almesberger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |