| To: | ahu@xxxxxxx (bert hubert) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: off by one error in 3des cbc keying |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Nov 2002 20:18:55 +0300 (MSK) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, gem@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021111100109.GB18677@outpost.ds9a.nl> from "bert hubert" at Nov 11, 2 11:01:09 am |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > [alexey's nameserver is off, cc to netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, perhaps he sees it > there] Unlikely. I think while our network is down list exploders just drop mails unlike normal mail agents. :-) > I wonder, is 'incoming bypass' implemented yet? It is. But your example shows that something is wrong there. Fix will follow later. > Key refreshing/updating doesn't appear to work either, after they key has > expired, all bets are off. What does happen in logs/setkey -D? Actually, before sending previous large patch dealing with expire timers I got it to the point where keys are refreshed nicely at _one_ side, another required reboot and the test was not accomplished. Alexey |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: off by one error in 3des cbc keying, bert hubert |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: off by one error in 3des cbc keying, bert hubert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: off by one error in 3des cbc keying, bert hubert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: off by one error in 3des cbc keying, bert hubert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |