| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx (Pekka Savola) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:24:11 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210231312070.28208-100000@netcore.fi> from "Pekka Savola" at Oct 23, 2 01:15:26 pm |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! Late question: > ::, at least previously. That worked e.g. on BSD. Does that work now, > too? Provided it uses IPV6_V6ONLY. > tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.53 *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 193.166.4.206.53 *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 193.166.187.10.53 *.* LISTEN > tcp6 0 0 *.53 *.* LISTEN ... > Will this work too? No. The question follows: what the hell does it make this? What is special in ipv4 that it needs to bind to its addresses? With IPV6_V6ONLY connections to all the IPv4 addresses but listed ones will be refused. I guess it is not _that_ thing which bind expects. Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | 未承諾広告※無料プレゼント, 無料プレゼント |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Question] SMP for Linux, Jon Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |