| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sendfile64() anyone? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?) |
| From: | Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:07:36 +0200 |
| Cc: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1035456463.10555.7.camel@rth.ninka.net> |
| Organization: | ProntoTV AS |
| References: | <200210231218.18733.roy@karlsbakk.net> <200210241230.46848.roy@karlsbakk.net> <1035456463.10555.7.camel@rth.ninka.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.4.1 |
On Thursday 24 October 2002 12:47, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 03:30, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
> > Are there any plans of implementing sendfile64() or sendfile() support
> > for -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64?
>
> This is old hat, and appears in every current vendor kernel I am
> aware of and is in 2.5.x as well.
then where can I find these patches? I cannot use 2.5, and I usually try to
stick with an official kernel.
and - if this patch has been around all this time...
why isn't it in the official kernel yet?
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, Datavaktmester
ProntoTV AS - http://www.pronto.tv/
Tel: +47 9801 3356
Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop working when you open Windows.
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Sysctl for ICMPv6 Rate Limitation, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?, Denis Vlasenko |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sendfile64() anyone? (was [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RESEND] tuning linux for high network performance?, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |