| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c |
| From: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Oct 2002 23:53:47 -0300 |
| Cc: | Michael Richardson <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, design@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021017045054.A405@wotan.suse.de> |
| References: | <200210170248.g9H2m6bf011892@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca> <20021017045054.A405@wotan.suse.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
Em Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:50:54AM +0200, Andi Kleen escreveu: > > I am looking for confirmation from network stack people that my conclusions > > from reading of the macros in linux/net.h is correct. > > What you should actually do is to add explicit proper SMP locking. > Then you don't need any SOCKOPS_WRAP hacks. yup, so that eventually we can kill this hackish bandaid. - Arnaldo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] change format of LSM hooks, Daniel Phillips |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c, Michael Richardson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |