| To: | niv@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Patch 2.5.43] IpInDelivers, IpInDiscards |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:43:26 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210171640190.3745-100000@w-nivedita.beaverton.ibm.com> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210171640190.3745-100000@w-nivedita.beaverton.ibm.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
"The number of input IP datagrams for which no
problems were encountered to prevent their continued
processing, but which were discarded (e.g., for lack
of buffer space). Note that this counter does not
include any datagrams discarded while awaiting re-assembly."
However, I dont really object to it being a catchall
for IP discards..
No, you are right. We should match mib specs here.
I will take care of this myself, no need to repatch :)
Thanks a lot for your work, I'll post what I end up applying
to my tree.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Patch 2.5.43] IpInDelivers, IpInDiscards, Nivedita Singhvi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCHSET] Mobile IPv6 for 2.5.43, Ville Nuorvala |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Patch 2.5.43] IpInDelivers, IpInDiscards, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Patch 2.5.43] IpInDelivers, IpInDiscards, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |