| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] LSM networking: skb hooks for 2.5.42 (2/7) |
| From: | Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:45:45 -0700 |
| Cc: | becker@xxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021015.123443.62397799.davem@redhat.com> |
| References: | <20021015.104014.34145167.davem@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210151353450.1159-100000@beohost.scyld.com> <20021015191626.GD15420@kroah.com> <20021015.123443.62397799.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4i |
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:34:43PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:16:26 -0700
>
> That being said, a number of people have asked that the networking hooks
> be able to "be compiled away", so we will be glad to do this.
>
> That's the only big beef I have with the LSM stuff,
> on a whole.
>
> I want to be able to say CONFIG_SECURITY=n and all of
> this stuff totally disappears. So use macros that expand
> to the security_ops->foo() when it's enabled, and compile
> into do { } while (0) when it is disabled.
Fair enough, mind if I create a CONFIG_SECURITY_NETWORK that we can use
for this?
The other LSM hooks seem to be working just fine compiled in, but I can
understand the network speed issues.
thanks,
greg k-h
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] LSM networking: skb hooks for 2.5.42 (2/7), David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] LSM networking: skb hooks for 2.5.42 (2/7), David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] LSM networking: skb hooks for 2.5.42 (2/7), David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] LSM networking: skb hooks for 2.5.42 (2/7), David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |