| To: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Patch: Idea for RFC2863 conform OperStatus |
| From: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:11:55 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <15786.42910.601886.468716@robur.slu.se> |
| Mail-followup-to: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <3DA82269.CBB65E89@isg.de> <20021014103855.GA19962@outpost.ds9a.nl> <15786.42910.601886.468716@robur.slu.se> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 01:16:46PM +0200, Robert Olsson wrote: > If you run a routing protocol BGP, OSPF etc it has it's own mechanism > with timers for declaring neighbours/link partners down. But yes in some > setups it can be useful -- with dampning. I bet Zebra would like to use this. I also know people who want to use this to change their own routes to, say, an alternate interface. > PS. Have seen 100 kpps in a Linux production router now. :-) With a bgp full view? 100kpps is not all that impressive in itself isn't it? We benchmarked our nameserver at 120kpps recently and linux seemed unimpressed :-) Regards, bert hubert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services http://www.tk the dot in .tk http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Patch: Idea for RFC2863 conform OperStatus, Robert Olsson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Patch: Idea for RFC2863 conform OperStatus, Robert Olsson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Patch: Idea for RFC2863 conform OperStatus, Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Patch: Idea for RFC2863 conform OperStatus, Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |