| To: | srompf@xxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH idea - netlink and link changes |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 12 Oct 2002 02:11:09 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | thockin@xxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3DA7EA1B.3D0430F@isg.de> |
| References: | <3DA7035F.5080101@sun.com> <3DA7EA1B.3D0430F@isg.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Stefan Rompf <srompf@xxxxxx> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:23:39 +0200 IMHO we should merge the patches, taking your one workqueue per device approach and my usage of IFF_RUNNING as a mirror bit. What do other netdev people think? I'm waiting for Jamal to catch up on his email and comment on this stuff, he had very clear ideas about what should be happening here. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Resplendor, resplendor |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH idea - netlink and link changes, Stefan Rompf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH idea - netlink and link changes, Stefan Rompf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH idea - netlink and link changes, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |