netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: dfawcus@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 16:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20021009234421.J29133@edinburgh.cisco.com>
References: <20021009170018.H29133@edinburgh.cisco.com> <uwuor9tg7.wl@sfc.wide.ad.jp> <20021009234421.J29133@edinburgh.cisco.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
I think the change was made because some TAHI test
failed without it, USAGI people is this right?

Most of USAGI changes are of this nature. :-)
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses, Derek Fawcus
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]