Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Fix Prefix Length of Link-local Addresses

[YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In article <20021007.115530.00078126.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 07 Oct 2002 
11:55:30 -0700 (PDT)), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says:

> BTW, we start to run into conflicts now and most of USAGI patches now
> I need to apply some parts by hand.  Here is one example, with this
> patch:
:
> It is not such a big deal now, but it may soon become larger as
> bigger USAGI patches are applied.  We will need to synchronize
> at some point.

Agreed.

So,... What kind of patches do you prefer, now?

 - on top of plain kernel (2.4.19, 2.4.20, 2.4.21-preXX, or whatever)
 - plain kernel + on top of our whole patch?
 - ???

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI @ USAGI Project <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
GPG FP: 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA