| To: | bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] abstract out socket lock.users access |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 07 Oct 2002 15:53:32 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021007185051.A25468@redhat.com> |
| References: | <20021007175551.B30693@redhat.com> <20021007.151459.09774569.davem@redhat.com> <20021007185051.A25468@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:50:51 -0400 Anyways, this version should be cleaned up, unless my eyes have glossed over and missed something in reading through the patch. Looks good, the sock_owned_by_user() is a needed good cleanup in any event. After some sleep I'll think some more about the async machinery and probably just apply this unless someone else finds something terribly wrong. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch] abstract out socket lock.users access, Benjamin LaHaise |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] C99 designated initializer for net/atm/lec.c, Art Haas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] abstract out socket lock.users access, Benjamin LaHaise |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] C99 designated initializer for net/atm/lec.c, Art Haas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |