netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: VLAN patches

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: VLAN patches
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 05:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: emann@xxxxxxx, greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Bjorn.Andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0210070757520.1861-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>
References: <3DA13332.4080109@mrv.com> <Pine.GSO.4.30.0210070757520.1861-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 08:05:07 -0400 (EDT)

   I never liked Bens patches that much compared to the other VLAN
   imp. -- would have prefered a marriage of the two.

There is a long thread deep in the archives for these lists
saying why Ben's code went it.

Please, let's not duplicate that conversation ok?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: VLAN patches, jamal
Next by Date:  Re: VLAN patches, Boro King
Previous by Thread:  Re: VLAN patches, jamal
Next by Thread:  Re: VLAN patches, Boro King
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]