netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: VLAN patches

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: VLAN patches
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2002 19:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Bjorn.Andersson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0210061839210.1861-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>
References: <20021005.220549.15266753.davem@redhat.com> <Pine.GSO.4.30.0210061839210.1861-100000@shell.cyberus.ca>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
   From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
   Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2002 18:47:50 -0400 (EDT)
   
   A packet with VLANid 0 and an 802.1p tag > 0 is legal. I
   think its known as a "priority tagged" packet (not 100% sure
   about the term). Therefore VLANid 0 MUST be accepted and ability to send
   it should be there.

Great, I stand corrected, please send me a patch which therefore
accepts VID 0 on create and destroy.

   BTW, what about VLANid 0xFFF?

Your guess is as good as mine ;-)
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!), Andre Hedrick
Next by Date:  Re: VLAN patches, Ben Greear
Previous by Thread:  Re: VLAN patches, jamal
Next by Thread:  Re: VLAN patches, Ben Greear
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]