| To: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:19:29 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021003.080408.78030688.davem@redhat.com> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20021003.231534.83777766.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20021004.000631.28088811.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20021003.080408.78030688.davem@redhat.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20021003.080408.78030688.davem@xxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 03 Oct 2002 08:04:08 -0700 (PDT)), "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> says: > I remember that test for daddr is for existing sockets, > not for socket doing XXX_get_port(). > So, I think I don't need to remove that. > > Where can daddr/dport be non-zero during get_port()? test for daddr if for sk2. sk2 is iterator for existing sockets, which can be "connected." daddr can be non-zero, can't it? Am I wrong??? --yoshfuji |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |