netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port

To: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:06:31 +0900 (JST)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20021003.231534.83777766.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20021003.121350.119660876.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <200210031301.RAA29267@sex.inr.ac.ru> <20021003.231534.83777766.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <20021003.231534.83777766.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 03 Oct 
2002 23:15:34 +0900 (JST)), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 
<yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> In article <200210031301.RAA29267@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:01:11 
> +0400 (MSD)), kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says:
> 
> > While doing *_get_port() daddr/dport are _unknown_ and always zero,
> > so it never works.
> > 
> > Please, remove these bits, the patch will become simpler.
> 
> Ok, I'll do that.

I remember that test for daddr is for existing sockets, 
not for socket doing XXX_get_port().
So, I think I don't need to remove that.

--yoshfuji


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>