| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:06:31 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021003.231534.83777766.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20021003.121350.119660876.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <200210031301.RAA29267@sex.inr.ac.ru> <20021003.231534.83777766.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20021003.231534.83777766.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 03 Oct 2002 23:15:34 +0900 (JST)), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > In article <200210031301.RAA29267@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Thu, 3 Oct 2002 17:01:11 > +0400 (MSD)), kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says: > > > While doing *_get_port() daddr/dport are _unknown_ and always zero, > > so it never works. > > > > Please, remove these bits, the patch will become simpler. > > Ok, I'll do that. I remember that test for daddr is for existing sockets, not for socket doing XXX_get_port(). So, I think I don't need to remove that. --yoshfuji |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |