| To: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:52:40 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021004.001929.03389091.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> from "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明" at Oct 4, 2 00:19:29 am |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > test for daddr if for sk2. > sk2 is iterator for existing sockets, which can be "connected." > daddr can be non-zero, can't it? > Am I wrong??? You are absolutely right. But then I am put to coma. Now I do not understand the goal of the check. Can you give a simple example showing what illegal case this check is supposed to eliminate? Actually, it would be great if you said what is wrong in that my patch? It looks so simple that I am not ready to agree that real one should be so complicated. :-) Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH Re: udp weirdness, Eric Lemoine |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] IPV6_V6ONLY Support, v2 (is Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |