| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 03 Oct 2002 06:13:40 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210031617360.8536-100000@netcore.fi> |
| References: | <20021003.060254.26942488.davem@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210031617360.8536-100000@netcore.fi> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:18:53 +0300 (EEST) On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > So does it make no sense at all to have IP_V4ONLY? Umm, I think an app guy can do that with creating an AF_INET socket; there will not be IPv6 there. Folks Who Think They Know Best decided that dual use for AF_INET6 would be best, and IPV6_V6ONLY was invented (note: it'd already implemented by some others) to repair that. Ok, ignore my silly idea then. Let us continue with verifying correctness of the USAGI patch. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same, Pekka Savola |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port, kuznet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Allow Both IPv6 and IPv4 Sockets on the Same Port, kuznet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |