| To: | "Xiaoliang \(David\) Wei" <weixl@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre* |
| From: | Richard Gooch <rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Sep 2002 00:34:02 -0600 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <002f01c2675d$b642b640$f5f2010a@weixl> |
| References: | <200209282257.g8SMvta32527@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> <002f01c2675d$b642b640$f5f2010a@weixl> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Xiaoliang Wei writes:
> Hi,
> Did you do the experiments on WAN or LAN? What's the other
> configurations, such as: The sending/receiving buffer(I think it
> should be larger than Bandwidth*Delay)?
This is all on a LAN (of course; expecting good performance from a WAN
is pretty futile). I use a buffer size of 256 KiB.
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current: rgooch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Xiaoliang \(David\) Wei |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Poor gige performance with 2.4.20-pre*, Benjamin LaHaise |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |