| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx (Pekka Savola) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Sep 2002 09:00:08 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, usagi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209280726010.8405-100000@netcore.fi> from "Pekka Savola" at Sep 28, 2 07:35:57 am |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > Isn't putting this logic to routes an oversimplification? Hmmm... I believed this logic is more complicated yet. :-) > route, as there would have to be at least two candidates there. ... > Am I missing something obvious here? Yes. You select some one of the candidates eventually, do not you? :-) And when you have some special preference for a subnet you create a route for it. > (stuff that's network prefix -independent I am sorry, I feel I do not understand what you mean. Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Pekka Savola |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Pekka Savola |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |