| To: | pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx (Pekka Savola) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection |
| From: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:55:20 +0400 (MSD) |
| Cc: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209271918090.2895-100000@netcore.fi> from "Pekka Savola" at Sep 27, 2 07:28:43 pm |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello! > But you agree that a new selection is important, I think? It is the thing which would be silly to disagree, people want this. :-) I do not want bogus implementation blocking attempts to select address for O(1) time. > If caching was implemented I guess it would be triggered by: It is just cached in routes like IP makes this. There is nothing sophisticated there, the logic is aligned to logic of routing cache. Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Refine IPv6 Address Validation Timer, kuznet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] migrate ioctls upwards, Matthew Wilcox |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, Pekka Savola |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |