| To: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:46:08 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | mbp@xxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Alan.Cox@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200209261309.RAA17837@sex.inr.ac.ru> |
| References: | <20020926054721.GA6039@samba.org> <200209261309.RAA17837@sex.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
From: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 17:09:11 +0400 (MSD) I do not understand why tcp_push_pending_frames() was not used there... maybe, there was some reason not to use it. Dave, do you not remember this? I was just trying to be too clever. That is all. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification, Roberto Nibali |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification for Netfilter, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, kuznet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FIN_WAIT1 / TCP_CORK / 2.2 -- reproducible bug and test case, Martin Pool |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |