| To: | akpm@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | SPECWeb99 Data -- tcp-wakeups |
| From: | Troy Wilson <tcw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:47:53 -0500 (CDT) |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, lse-tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
********************************************************************
* SPEC(tm) and the benchmark name SPECweb(tm) are registered *
* trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. *
* This benchmarking was performed for research purposes only, *
* and is non-compliant, with the following deviations from the *
* rules - *
* *
* 1 - It was run on hardware that does not meed the SPEC *
* availability-to-the-public criteria. The machine is *
* an engineering sample. *
* *
* 2 - access_log wasn't kept for full accounting. It was *
* being written, but deleted every 200 seconds. *
********************************************************************
I've done some testing with SPECWeb99 on 2.5.35 mm1 with and without
the tcp-wakeups patch backed out. The addition of tcp-wakeups makes a 2%
improvement in performance.
mm1 mm1 without tcp-wakeup
-----------------------------------------
Simultaneous connections 3049 2982
The system is an 8-way, 900MHz, Profusion-based P3 box with 32GB memory.
It's connected to 16 SPECWeb client machines via 4 e1000 gigabit adapters.
I'm using Apache 2.0.36 as the webserver.
- Troy
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] IPv6: Don't Process ND Messages with Invalid Options, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Question] SMP for TCP/IP Stack, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] IPv6: Don't Process ND Messages with Invalid Options, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] NF-HIPAC: High Performance Packet Classification, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |